
Ship Design Assistant
Accelerate ship design analysis with AI-powered trade-off evaluation
What You Can Do
Analyze complex hull design trade-offs between performance metrics like stability, speed, and fuel efficiency. Validate your designs against maritime regulations including IMO SOLAS, MARPOL, and flag state requirements. Generate comprehensive design documentation and performance optimization recommendations to support faster, data-driven decision-making throughout your design cycle.
Features
Compare multiple hull configurations across performance dimensions (resistance, stability, seakeeping) to identify optimal balance points for your vessel type
Verify designs against maritime standards including SOLAS, MARPOL, IMO regulations, and classification society rules (ABS, Lloyd's, DNV, ClassNK)
Evaluate fuel efficiency, powering requirements, and resistance characteristics to optimize operating costs and environmental impact
Assess build materials, structural efficiency, and cost implications across different design choices and steel grades
Check alignment with emissions regulations (IMO 2030/2050, EEDI, SEEMP requirements) and decarbonization targets
Create technical specifications, design rationale documents, and compliance reports suitable for classification societies and stakeholders
Evaluate habitability standards, ergonomics, and safety requirements per maritime regulations and industry best practices
Benchmark your design against historical vessel data and industry standards to identify competitive advantages and gaps
Example Output
Example 1: Trade-off Analysis Hull Design A (Bulk Carrier): Speed 14.5kt, Fuel consumption 65t/day, Stability GM 2.1m, Cost $45M Hull Design B (Optimized): Speed 14.2kt, Fuel consumption 58t/day, Stability GM 2.3m, Cost $47M Recommendation: Design B offers 11% fuel savings and better stability with $2M cost premium (payback in ~8 months of operation)
Example 2: Compliance Checklist SOLAS Chapter II-1 Subdivision & Stability: Pass MARPOL Annex I Oil Pollution Prevention: Pass IMO 2030 Energy Intensity Index (EII): Pass SEEMP Plan Crew Training Procedures: Needs Review Flag State (Panama): All requirements satisfied
Example 3: Performance Optimization Current Design: 65t fuel/day at 14.5kt design speed Recommendation: Optimize bow shape (bulbous bow tuning) and hull coating Predicted Improvement: 8-12% fuel reduction (4.5-6.5t/day savings) CO2 Reduction: 12,500-17,500 tonnes annually on 350-day voyage year
What's Included
- Hull Configuration Analyzer: Evaluate and compare different hull designs, dimensions, and configurations for performance characteristics
- Regulatory Compliance Checker: Systematic verification against IMO, SOLAS, MARPOL, and classification society requirements with detailed findings
- Performance Optimization Engine: Generate specific recommendations to improve fuel efficiency, stability margins, and structural efficiency
- Cost-Benefit Analyzer: Quantify trade-offs between design options with build costs, operational expenses, and payback periods
- Documentation Template Library: Pre-structured templates for design specifications, compliance reports, and stakeholder presentations
Who It's For
- Naval Architects
- Marine Engineers
- Ship Design Engineers
- Maritime Consultants
- Shipyard Design Managers
Best For
- Early-stage hull concept design and feasibility analysis
- Design trade-off evaluation and sensitivity analysis
- Regulatory compliance verification and documentation
- Performance optimization and efficiency improvement
- Design documentation and technical report generation







