Clinical Trial Data Validation & Query Resolution
Validate clinical trial data against protocol specs and resolve discrepancies for FDA compliance
What You Can Do
You can automate the validation of clinical trial data against protocol specifications, identify discrepancies including missing values, out-of-range results, protocol violations, and CRF inconsistencies. The skill generates audit-ready query documentation, categorizes anomalies by severity and type, resolves root causes systematically, and produces FDA inspection-ready reports that trace every data decision and corrective action for CDISC and regulatory submission.
Features
Checks inclusion/exclusion criteria, dosing rules, visit windows, and CRF completion requirements against study protocol
Automatically classifies query types (missing data, range errors, logical inconsistencies, source mismatch) for systematic resolution
Flags critical adverse events and lab values for urgent review separate from administrative data issues
Creates traceable, timestamped records of every query, decision, and corrective action for audit trails
Identifies non-adherence patterns (missed visits, ineligible subjects, dose deviations) across study population
Formats validation reports and query logs to CDISC standards for seamless regulatory submission
Ensures queries and data handling follow Good Clinical Practice standards to prevent regulatory findings
Systematically determines source of discrepancies (data entry error, missing source docs, protocol misunderstanding)
Example Output
Example 1: EDC Download Validation Report
Subject ID: 001-0045 | Visit: Week 12 | Status: HOLD
- ⚠️ CRITICAL SAFETY QUERY
- Lab Value Out of Range: ALT 245 U/L (protocol limit: <3x ULN = 120 U/L)
- Query Type: Range Error
- Action Required: Obtain source documentation, verify AE reporting
- Priority: Urgent (safety)
- ⚠️ DATA INTEGRITY QUERY
- Missing CRF Section: Concomitant Medications Visit 12
- Query Type: Incomplete Data
- Expected Source: Subject diary + pharmacy records
- Assigned to: Site Coordinator
Example 2: Protocol Deviation Summary
- 🚫 PROTOCOL VIOLATION DETECTED
Subject 002-0078: Inclusion Criterion Breach
- Criterion: eGFR ≥30 mL/min/1.73m²
- Baseline Value: 28 mL/min/1.73m² (SOURCE: Lab 2024-01-15)
- Deviation Type: Ineligible subject enrolled
- Regulatory Impact: Major (affects subject safety assessment)
- Resolution: Withdraw subject per protocol section 5.2
Example 3: Query Resolution Log
- ✅ RESOLVED QUERY #CRF-2024-0156
Original Issue: Dosing schedule discrepancy (5mg vs 10mg Day 1)
Root Cause: Data entry error + missing source document signature
Resolution: Corrected EDC to 5mg per source, obtained signed SOP confirmation
Resolved By: CRA Smith | Date: 2024-02-20 14:32 UTC | Audit Trail: Locked
What's Included
- SKILL.md instruction file: Complete clinical trial data validation protocol
- Protocol Compliance Checklist: ICH-GCP and protocol requirement validation matrix
- Query Resolution Template: Structured log for categorizing, investigating, and documenting discrepancies
- Risk-Based Prioritization Framework: Safety vs. administrative query triage matrix
- Deviation Report Generator: Regulatory-ready protocol deviation documentation with audit trails
Who It's For
- Clinical Research Associates (CRAs) — Managing data validation workflows and query resolution across sites
- Data Managers — Overseeing EDC database cleanup and CDISC submission readiness
- Quality Assurance/Compliance Specialists — Auditing data integrity and regulatory inspection preparation
- Regulatory Affairs Professionals — Preparing inspection-ready documentation and FDA communications
- Clinical Trial Coordinators — Resolving site-level discrepancies and protocol deviations
Best For
- EDC data validation after each study visit to catch discrepancies before database lock
- Protocol deviation identification across enrolled subjects for enrollment and safety compliance
- Safety data review prioritizing adverse events and lab anomalies for urgent assessment
- Query documentation creating audit-ready records for FDA inspection and regulatory submission
- Inclusion/exclusion criterion verification ensuring enrolled subjects meet study eligibility
You might also like
This skill systematically analyzes your product designs to identify manufacturability issues early, saving costly revisions and manufacturing delays. It evaluates geometry, material selection, tolerances, assembly feasibility, and production process constraints. You get actionable feedback on cost drivers, process risks, and design optimizations before committing to production.
by kody-w
You can submit tool designs—drawings, specifications, or descriptions—and Claude will evaluate manufacturability constraints, identify potential failure modes using structured frameworks, and recommend cost-reduction opportunities. You'll receive a prioritized report covering structural analysis, production feasibility, material efficiency, and design trade-offs.
by kody-wThis skill interprets your FEA simulation results and extracts actionable design improvements. You can pinpoint stress concentrations, validate designs against safety factors and material limits, and receive specific geometry recommendations to reduce weight or improve performance. By automating FEA post-processing, you compress design iteration cycles and make engineering decisions faster.
by kody-w
You can validate eCRF and paper CRF datasets against protocol-defined rules, automatically identify data discrepancies (missing fields, out-of-range values, date inconsistencies), generate structured Data Query Forms (DQFs) for site clarification, track resolution status, and create audit-ready compliance documentation that meets FDA 21 CFR Part 11 and GCP requirements. This workflow reduces manual validation time while ensuring 100% traceability and regulatory readiness for inspections.
by kody-w
Get comprehensive PCB design analysis covering power delivery networks, signal integrity, thermal management, and manufacturing constraints. Claude identifies potential issues early and provides specific, actionable optimization recommendations to reduce cost, improve reliability, and accelerate time-to-market. Suitable for designs from initial concept through production-ready layouts.
by kody-w
You consolidate parallel data streams from preclinical toxicology studies (clinical pathology, histopathology, body weight changes, organ weights, clinical observations, mortality) into coherent regulatory-compliant narratives. This skill synthesizes findings across 6–12 endpoints simultaneously, identifies NOAEL/LOAEL with biological justification, determines safety margins, interprets species-specific or sex-specific signals, and produces Results & Discussion sections that satisfy FDA/EMA reviewers while supporting appropriate dosing decisions for IND-enabling studies.
by kody-w
You can translate raw variant catalogs and NGS data into actionable target hypotheses by synthesizing variant effect predictions, population frequency metrics, disease association evidence, and protein interaction networks. This skill automates the connection between molecular findings and clinical relevance, producing comprehensive variant assessments that justify target selection across pharmaceutical development stages and support regulatory submissions.
by kody-w
You can analyze equipment sensors, operational logs, and historical maintenance data to predict failures weeks in advance. Claude generates actionable maintenance schedules, identifies high-risk assets, and calculates the financial impact of preventive vs. reactive maintenance. This skill transforms raw operational data into strategic maintenance decisions that minimize downtime and extend asset life.
by kody-w