
Trajectory Optimization Validator for ADAS/AV Planning
Validate ADAS/AV trajectories against safety, comfort, and regulatory constraints
What You Can Do
You can evaluate trajectory candidates against your ADAS/AV system's specific kinematic, dynamic, and comfort constraints in seconds. The skill identifies which constraints are violated, explains root causes, suggests optimization strategies, and generates compliance documentation for functional safety audits—eliminating manual verification errors that could reach simulation or road testing.
Features
checks curvature, acceleration, jerk limits against vehicle capabilities
flags breaches of safety, comfort, and regulatory thresholds with root-cause analysis
analyzes trade-offs and recommends parameter adjustments for competing objectives
documents trajectory validation for functional safety audits and ASIL ratings
ranks multiple planning solutions against your system's weighted objectives
derives specification requirements from failed trajectory examples
explains why trajectories violate constraints and suggests correction strategies
processes multiple scenarios and exports structured compliance documentation
Example Output
Input: Trajectory with max lateral acceleration 8.5 m/s², comfort limit 5 m/s²
Output:
✗ COMFORT VIOLATION: Lateral acceleration exceeds 5 m/s² limit
- Peak: 8.5 m/s² at waypoint 12 (t=2.3s)
- Root cause: Turn radius 45m at speed 18 m/s → a = v²/r = 7.2 m/s²
- Recommendation: Increase radius to 65m OR reduce speed to 15 m/s
✓ SAFETY OK: Below 12 m/s² emergency limit
✓ DYNAMICS OK: Feasible for vehicle with 0.95g lateral grip
✓ ISO 26262: Trajectory meets ASIL B requirements
Compare two lane-change candidates:
Trajectory A: 3.2s duration, 4.8 m/s² peak comfort ✓
Trajectory B: 2.1s duration, 6.2 m/s² peak comfort ✗
Recommendation: Use A for passenger comfort; B only for emergency maneuvers
What's Included
- SKILL.md instruction file with constraint frameworks and validation logic:
- Constraint validation checklist (safety limits, comfort thresholds, kinematic/dynamic bounds):
- Trajectory evaluation template for systematic analysis of motion planning outputs:
- ISO 26262 compliance mapping linking trajectory validation to functional safety evidence:
- Multi-objective optimization worksheet for safety vs. comfort trade-off analysis:
- Batch validation report generator for processing multiple scenarios and exporting structured findings:
Who It's For
- ADAS/autonomous vehicle planning engineers validating motion planner outputs
- Control systems engineers designing trajectory optimization constraints
- Functional safety engineers documenting ISO 26262/SOTIF compliance for AV systems
- Simulation engineers screening trajectory candidates before vehicle-in-the-loop testing
- Autonomous vehicle program managers tracking planning system maturity and safety readiness
Best For
- Pre-simulation trajectory validation to catch planning failures early
- Root-cause analysis of constraint violations in failing scenarios
- Safety vs. comfort optimization for specific driving conditions
- Compliance evidence generation for functional safety audits
- Comparative ranking of multiple trajectory candidates
- Batch processing of hundreds of scenario trajectories for statistical validation







