
Sports Injury Assessment & Return-to-Play Protocol
Systematically assess sports injuries and create evidence-based return-to-play protocols
What You Can Do
You can perform structured sports injury evaluations that incorporate mechanism-of-injury analysis, orthopedic special testing, functional movement screening, and clear referral criteria. The skill helps you differentiate soft tissue restrictions from joint dysfunctions, establish baseline function, and create evidence-based return-to-play milestones tailored to the athlete's sport and position. You'll generate documentation suitable for insurance records, team physician communication, and liability protection.
Features
systematically reconstruct the injury event to narrow differential diagnoses
apply evidence-based tests (Lachman, pivot shift, McMurray's, etc.) with proper positioning and interpretation
rule in/out common conditions by anatomical region and special test clustering
assess sport-specific patterns (cutting, jumping, throwing) to identify deficits
establish phase-based milestones (pain-free ROM → strength → sport-specific movement → full participation)
identify conditions requiring immediate physician referral (fractures, severe ligament tears, neurological compromise)
generate comprehensive assessment records for insurance, legal, and athlete communication
Example Output
Example 1: Acute Ankle Inversion Injury
- Chief complaint: Right ankle inversion injury during soccer (mechanism documented)
- Special tests: Anterior drawer (positive), inversion stress test (mild positive), squeeze test (negative)
- Differential: Grade I-II anterior talofibular ligament sprain vs. syndesmotic involvement
- Referral decision: Imaging recommended if severe swelling/inability to bear weight
- RTP Protocol: Phase 1 (pain-free ROM, ankle alphabet exercises) → Phase 2 (proprioceptive training, resistance band work) → Phase 3 (agility drills, sport-specific cutting) → Phase 4 (full soccer participation with prophylactic bracing)
Example 2: Chronic Shoulder Impingement (Volleyball)
- Chief complaint: 8-week overhead pain pattern, worsening with serving
- Special tests: Neer impingement sign (positive), Hawkins-Kennedy (positive), resisted external rotation (weak at 90/90 position)
- Movement screening: Scapular dyskinesis noted during overhead reach
- Differential: Subacromial impingement with rotator cuff fatigue
- RTP Protocol: Phase 1 (scapular stabilization, posterior chain mobility) → Phase 2 (rotator cuff strengthening at progressive speeds) → Phase 3 (plyometric training, interval throwing program) → Phase 4 (return to competitive serving with technique correction)
What's Included
- SKILL.md instruction file with assessment framework and red flag criteria:
- Orthopedic Special Tests Reference: indexed by body region with proper positioning, performance cues, and sensitivity/specificity data
- Return-to-Play Progression Template: phase-based milestones for common sports injuries (ankle, knee, shoulder, elbow, hip)
- Mechanism-of-Injury Worksheet: systematic questions to reconstruct injury mechanism and guide differential diagnosis
- Assessment Documentation Checklist: comprehensive record template for insurance and legal protection
Who It's For
- Sports chiropractors managing athlete populations with acute and chronic injuries
- Athletic trainers and assistant athletic trainers documenting injury assessments for team physicians
- Orthopedic technicians preparing comprehensive evaluation summaries for provider review
- Sports medicine clinics establishing standardized assessment and return-to-play protocols
- Team healthcare providers communicating injury status and progression to coaches and athletic directors
Best For
- Initial injury evaluations requiring reproducible, evidence-based documentation
- Determining appropriate referral timing and criteria for physician evaluation
- Establishing sport-specific return-to-play progression milestones and testing protocols
- Differentiating between similar presentations (e.g., ankle sprain vs. syndesmotic injury, rotator cuff vs. impingement)
- Creating communication summaries for team physicians, coaches, and insurance carriers
- Reassessing athletes at treatment milestones when progression criteria need objective validation







