Sanctions Screening Pattern Analyzer
Detect sanctions evasion patterns and network anomalies beyond list-matching
What You Can Do
Analyze transaction networks, corporate structures, and beneficial ownership relationships to uncover indirect sanctions exposure and evasion methodologies. You can flag structuring patterns, shell entity networks, trade-based money laundering indicators, and entity relationship anomalies that standard list-matching tools miss. The skill helps you prioritize cases for enhanced due diligence and escalation by identifying geographic, sectoral, and transactional red flags consistent with known sanctions evasion tactics.
Features
uncover obfuscated corporate structures and identify ultimate beneficial owners through layered entity relationships
detect structuring, unusual routing changes, and frequency anomalies indicative of evasion attempts
analyze customer networks and indirect OFAC exposure through multi-hop corporate and transactional connections
recognize trade-based money laundering (TBML), invoice manipulation, and shell entity tactics specific to sanctions evasion
identify high-risk jurisdictions, politically exposed persons (PEPs), and sectoral indicators for emerging sanctions programs
surface cases requiring escalation with supporting pattern evidence and anomaly confidence scoring
structure findings to support OFAC exams, third-party audits, and internal compliance documentation
Example Output
Input: Transaction network dataset with 47 entities connected to a customer; beneficial ownership unclear; frequent fund flows to Iran-adjacent jurisdictions via shell companies.
Output:
- ⚠️ HIGH-RISK PATTERN DETECTED
Evasion Method: Beneficial Ownership Obfuscation + Geographic Layering
• Entity A (Customer) → Entity B (Isle of Man HoldCo) → Entity C (Cyprus Trading Co) → Entity D (Dubai Subsidiary) → Entity E (Iran-Linked Bank)
• Pattern Confidence: 87% (matches 6/7 TBML indicators)
• Recommended Action: EDD + escalation to Chief Compliance Officer
• Next Steps: Beneficial ownership verification, source of funds documentation, transaction justification
Input: High-volume transaction to Russia-sanctioned sector with unusual routing and invoice manipulation red flags.
Output:
- 🚩 STRUCTURAL ANOMALY: Sectoral Evasion Signal
• Transaction Value: $2.3M to "Technology Consulting"
• Indicator Match: Double-invoicing pattern (3 instances), mismatched invoice dates, goods descriptions vague
• Sanctioned Entity Exposure: 72% match probability to Russian IRGC procurement networks
• Risk Score: 8.9/10 — Recommend immediate transaction block and customer review
What's Included
- SKILL.md instruction file with pattern taxonomy and methodology:
- Evasion Pattern Reference Matrix: documented tactics (structuring, TBML, beneficial ownership obfuscation, sectoral proxies)
- Transaction Network Analysis Template: entity mapping framework and relationship scoring rubric
- EDD Escalation Checklist: documentation requirements, investigation prompts, and regulatory alignment
- Sanctions Risk Indicator Scorecard: geographic, sectoral, and behavioral red flags with weighting guidance
Who It's For
- BSA/AML Officers — frontline compliance professionals conducting transaction monitoring and case investigations
- Sanctions Compliance Managers — overseeing OFAC screening programs and regulatory exam preparation
- Compliance Analysts — reviewing high-risk customers, corporate structures, and cross-border transactions
- Risk Management Teams — supporting emerging sanctions program implementation and framework development
- Internal Audit & Compliance — validating transaction monitoring effectiveness and supporting third-party examinations
Best For
- Ongoing transaction monitoring beyond initial KYC screening
- Corporate beneficial ownership verification and structure clarity assessment
- Investigation of suspicious customer networks and indirect OFAC exposure
- Analysis of high-complexity transactions with unexplained routing or multiple intermediaries
- Enhanced due diligence case prioritization and escalation documentation
- Regulatory exam preparation and third-party audit support
- Risk framework development for emerging or sectoral sanctions programs
You might also like
Conduct thorough, documented customer risk assessments using structured compliance decision trees aligned with FinCEN, OFAC, and BSA standards. You'll evaluate customer information, identify regulatory red flags, determine appropriate risk classifications, and generate audit-ready documentation that demonstrates defensible decision-making during regulatory examinations. This skill accelerates due diligence while reducing compliance gaps and creating the paper trail regulators expect.
by eternaljust
This skill guides you through SAR preparation with structured compliance validation, ensuring your filings meet FinCEN requirements and withstand regulatory examination. You'll validate mandatory fields, risk-score transactions against BSA/AML thresholds, document investigation procedures for audit defensibility, and cross-check against common rejection reasons that delay filing. The skill helps you align documentation across Operations, Risk, Compliance, and Legal teams to ensure timely, accurate SAR submission within the 30/60-day timeline.
by eternaljust
You get proven templates, decision trees, and frameworks to design complete business automation systems from scratch. Cut implementation time by 70%, reduce manual work by 80%, and build processes that scale across your entire organization without custom coding or guesswork.
by eternaljust
You can systematically evaluate customer risk profiles using a consistent methodology that integrates beneficial ownership verification, customer intelligence gathering, and risk scoring. The framework guides you through determining whether baseline CDD or enhanced due diligence is required, documents your decision rationale in audit-trail format, and generates compliance-ready files that satisfy regulatory examination standards.
by eternaljust
Systematically identify chart patterns and validate them using technical confluence scoring. You get actionable trade setups with entry/exit levels and risk/reward analysis based on multiple indicator confirmation. Filter false signals and improve your trade quality by combining technical indicators in a disciplined framework.
by eternaljust
You can systematically analyze CRE loan applications—acquisitions, refinances, and construction—using a disciplined underwriting framework that evaluates borrower experience, property cash flow generation, market dynamics, and loan structure risk. The skill produces detailed credit memoranda with quantified risk assessments, debt service coverage analysis, stress scenarios, and explicit recommendations, enabling you to identify credit issues early and support loan committee decisions with institutional-grade documentation.
by eternaljust
You systematically evaluate consumer credit applications by synthesizing credit reports, income documentation, employment history, and behavioral indicators into quantified risk assessments. The framework generates defensible approval/decline recommendations tiered by risk level (prime, near-prime, subprime), incorporates Fair Lending Act compliance checks, and documents decisions that withstand regulatory examination and customer appeals.
by eternaljust
You can apply a structured risk assessment framework to transaction alerts, consistently scoring suspicious activity against regulatory expectations and internal thresholds. Claude helps you triage alerts efficiently, document decision rationale for examination readiness, and classify activity by risk level to prioritize investigations and determine SAR filing obligations while minimizing time spent on false positives.
by eternaljust