Regulatory Submission Compliance Architect
Architect FDA/EMA submissions with AI-powered compliance validation
What You Can Do
You can structure complex regulatory submissions with automated compliance validation, ensuring all documents align with FDA and EMA requirements. The skill validates cross-references, identifies documentation gaps, and generates audit-ready compliance evidence—reducing submission errors and accelerating approval timelines.
Features
Automatically maps your submission documents against FDA 21 CFR and EMA ICH guidelines, ensuring every requirement is addressed with clear cross-references.
Validates the logical hierarchy, naming conventions, and formatting of regulatory documents against submission standards, catching structural errors before submission.
Scans your entire submission for broken or inconsistent cross-references between documents, sections, and supporting data, ensuring complete traceability.
Generates customized compliance checklists based on submission type (510(k), BLA, IND, MAA), tracking completion status and evidence requirements.
Identifies missing documentation, inconsistencies, and compliance risks with severity prioritization to guide remediation efforts.
Provides an objective 0–100 readiness score that predicts submission success likelihood, helping you decide whether to submit or revise further.
Exports validated submissions in eCopy (FDA standard), PDF, and structured XML formats, ready for regulatory portal upload.
Example Output
Compliance Checklist Output
Product: Cardiac Monitor Model XYZ | Submission Type: 510(k) Predicate
- ✅ Device Description (Section 2.1) — Complete with images
- ✅ Intended Use Statement (Section 1.1) — Reviewed by Legal
- ⚠️ Biocompatibility Data (Section 4.3) — ISO 10993-5 pending, due 2026-09-15
- ❌ Clinical Validation (Section 5.2) — Missing 30-day follow-up data
Readiness Score: 78/100 | Estimated Gap Time: 21 days
Cross-Reference Audit Report
Missing References: 2 issues found
- Figure 2.4 referenced in Section 3.1 but not included in appendix
- Study ID REF-2025-014 cited 4 times; 1 citation missing author attestation
Inconsistencies: Device dimensions listed as 150mm (Section 2.1) vs. 152mm (Section 4.1)
Regulatory Gap Analysis
High Risk: No biocompatibility pathway selected (ISO 10993 vs. USP <87>) Medium Risk: Shelf-life validation incomplete; 6-month data submitted vs. 24-month claimed Low Risk: Device labeling font size complies with 21 CFR 801.4 but below industry best practice
What's Included
- FDA & EMA Requirement Database: Pre-built mappings of 21 CFR Part 11, Part 820, ICH Q9, and EMA guidelines, updated quarterly for regulatory changes.
- Document Structure Templates: Ready-to-use regulatory submission templates for common pathways including 510(k), BLA, IND, and Marketing Authorization Applications.
- Compliance Validation Engine: Automated checker that validates document completeness, formatting, cross-references, and regulatory alignment in real-time.
- Checklist & Audit Trail Generator: Creates compliance checklists with version control and audit evidence, inspection-ready for regulatory audits.
- Gap & Risk Analysis Tools: Identifies missing documentation, inconsistencies, and compliance risks with prioritized remediation guidance and timeline estimates.
- Quick-Start Industry Guides: Submission-type walkthroughs for pharma, medical devices, and biologics with regulatory pathway decision trees.
Who It's For
- Regulatory Affairs Managers
- Quality Assurance & Compliance Specialists
- Pharmaceutical & Biotech Program Managers
- Medical Device Regulatory Professionals
- Compliance Consultants & Contract Research Organizations
Best For
- FDA 510(k) & PMA submission preparation
- EMA Marketing Authorization Application dossier assembly
- IND/CTA regulatory submissions
- Pre-submission compliance audits & gap remediation
- Cross-functional submission documentation coordination
You might also like
You can systematically review research protocols against ethical frameworks, regulatory standards, and risk-benefit principles. This skill identifies compliance gaps, assesses risks to human or animal subjects, evaluates scientific merit against potential harms, and generates structured compliance reports that support institutional review board (IRB) decisions and regulatory submissions.
by hah23255
You'll design and optimize observational study protocols from conception through regulatory documentation. The skill guides you through identifying and quantifying confounders, selecting appropriate study designs (cohort, case-control, cross-sectional), implementing bias mitigation strategies, and generating publication-ready protocols that meet regulatory standards.
by hah23255
Design, validate, and refine clinical device trial protocols that meet FDA and ICH regulatory requirements. You'll receive detailed protocol structure, endpoint validation matrices, statistical power analysis, and enrollment strategy recommendations that accelerate patient recruitment while maintaining compliance.
by hah23255
You get expert guidance developing NSF-aligned healthcare research proposals from strategic positioning through final compliance. Claude analyzes your research concept against NSF priorities, structures a competitive narrative, justifies budget allocations, and ensures all compliance requirements (biosketch, data management plans, institutional review) are met. The result is a cohesive, review-ready proposal that increases your chances of NSF funding.
by hah23255
You structure clinical research manuscripts according to IMRaD (Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion) standards required by peer-reviewed journals. This skill helps you draft sections from raw research notes, polish prose for academic clarity, enforce citation standards, and identify common submission issues before sending to journals. The result is a manuscript ready for peer review with minimal editor feedback.
by hah23255
You can systematically work through complex clinical ethical dilemmas using proven frameworks like the Four Principles approach, principlism, casuistry, and virtue ethics. The skill maps all stakeholders, identifies competing ethical obligations, and generates IRB-ready documentation that prepares you for ethics committee consultations. You'll receive structured analysis, conflict resolution pathways, and compliance recommendations tailored to your specific case.
by hah23255
Create fully-accredited continuing medical education programs with learning objectives, educational content, assessments, and evaluation materials that meet ACCME and ANCC standards. This skill automates compliance validation, ensures proper alignment between objectives and content, and generates all required accreditation documentation in minutes instead of weeks.
by hah23255
You can design, validate, and execute statistical analyses for health outcomes research, comparative effectiveness studies, and clinical trials with regulatory rigor. This skill guides you through study design validation, appropriate statistical method selection, data quality assessment, hypothesis testing, and results interpretation aligned with FDA, EMA, and ICH-GCP standards. You'll generate publication-ready analysis plans and ensure your findings meet scientific and regulatory requirements for peer review or submission.
by hah23255