
Energy Efficiency Program Design Optimizer
Design code-compliant energy efficiency programs with verified savings frameworks
What You Can Do
You can design complete energy efficiency program architectures that balance technical rigor, regulatory compliance, and measurable outcomes. This skill helps you establish participant eligibility frameworks, develop baseline methodologies, structure savings calculation protocols, and create verification systems that satisfy utility commissions, funders, and program participants while delivering verified energy and demand savings.
Features
articulate logic models linking program activities to energy savings outcomes and participant behavior change
design approaches for defining pre-program consumption baselines across residential, commercial, and industrial segments
structure M&V protocols including deemed savings tables, deemed coefficient approaches, and custom calculation methods
align program designs with DSM portfolio strategy and regulatory requirements specific to your jurisdiction
develop participant screening criteria, enrollment processes, and market segment targeting strategies
calculate and schedule rebate amounts, incentive triggers, and cost-effectiveness thresholds by measure type
align program rules with utility commission requirements, codes of conduct, and performance standards
establish program-specific KPIs, savings targets, and tracking mechanisms for ongoing evaluation
Example Output
Program Design Output Example 1: Residential HVAC Program Baseline
- Baseline definition: Weather-normalized consumption model using 5-year historical data (TMY3 adjustments)
- Deemed savings: 12% annual consumption reduction for heat pump replacement; 8% for furnace tune-up
- Verification: Post-installation inspection + 1-year consumption comparison against modeled baseline
- Eligible segments: Owner-occupied homes, rental properties (landlord consent required)
- Incentive schedule: $500 (heat pump), $150 (tune-up); higher amounts for low-income participants
Program Design Output Example 2: Commercial Lighting Custom Measure Protocol
- Baseline: Pre-retrofit lighting power density (W/ft²) from site survey + assumed operating hours from ASHRAE defaults
- Savings equation: (kWpre − kWpost) × hours/year × realization rate
- Verification tiers: Deemed (standard offices ≤500 kWh savings), Stipulated (prescriptive fixtures), Custom (engineering calculations for industrial)
- Participant cost threshold: Incentive caps at 50% of measure cost; cost-effectiveness floor of 0.8 TRC
- Post-installation documentation: Photographic evidence, equipment specification sheets, operating schedule confirmation
What's Included
- SKILL.md instruction file: complete program design methodology with decision trees and compliance checkpoints
- Program design template: structured worksheet covering program theory, eligibility, baselines, savings verification, and performance metrics
- Baseline methodology framework: approaches for deemed, stipulated, and custom baseline establishment with regression and engineering calculation examples
- M&V protocol checklist: verification requirements, documentation standards, and quality assurance procedures by program type
- Regulatory compliance matrix: mapping requirements across FEMP, ASHRAE, utility commission standards, and IOU performance benchmarks
Who It's For
- Energy efficiency program managers — designing residential, commercial, or industrial efficiency initiatives
- Utility program planners — structuring DSM portfolios and demand-side resource portfolios aligned with regulatory filings
- Energy consultants — architecting custom programs for municipal, state, or regional energy offices
- Evaluation specialists — establishing measurement frameworks and savings verification methodologies
- Regulatory compliance officers — ensuring program designs meet utility commission and performance standards requirements
Best For
- Designing new residential or commercial efficiency rebate programs
- Establishing baseline methodologies for custom or prescriptive energy measures
- Structuring savings verification and M&V protocols for regulatory approval
- Creating program rules, eligibility criteria, and participant enrollment workflows
- Developing deemed savings tables and incentive schedules by measure type and market segment
- Aligning program designs with demand-side management portfolio strategy and utility commission requirements







