DoD Research Proposal & Compliance Management
Write DoD proposals that pass compliance while winning grants
What You Can Do
You'll master DFARS regulations, military procurement rules, and research compliance requirements to accelerate proposal development. This skill helps you identify compliance risks before submission, structure proposals using DoD-approved narratives, and ensure every cost claim aligns with federal acquisition regulations.
Features
Scan proposals against Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement requirements, flagging clauses, IP restrictions, and organizational conflicts before submission.
Generate section outlines (executive summary, technical approach, management plan, costs) tailored to DoD funding mechanisms (STTR, SBIR, BAA, MURI).
Translate military jargon, acronyms (SOCOM, DARPA, CRADA), and procurement terms used in RFPs and award conditions.
Identify organizational conflicts, cybersecurity facility requirements, and foreign national restrictions that trigger proposal disqualification.
Verify indirect cost rates, overhead ceilings, and cost allowability under DFARS Cost Principles for healthcare and non-profit institutions.
Map compliance, technical, and schedule risks with mitigation strategies aligned to DoD risk management expectations.
Surface recent DoD FAR updates, NDIA guidance changes, and compliance deadline shifts relevant to your institution and funding mechanism.
Example Output
Example 1: DFARS Compliance Audit Report
✓ Clause 252.204-7000 (Disclosure of Affiliations) → Included
✓ Data rights restrictions for DFARS technical data → Addressed in Section 4.3
⚠ Foreign nationals on team → Flagged for ITAR screening
✗ Organizational conflict disclosure → MISSING — Add Appendix B
Risk Level: MEDIUM | Remediation: Add 2 pages conflict analysis
Example 2: Proposal Section Outline (DARPA BAA)
1. Executive Summary (2 pages)
- Problem statement, innovation gap, military impact
2. Technical Approach (8 pages)
- Phase I/II milestones, TRL advancement, validation
3. Management Plan (2 pages)
- Team roles, risk mitigation, schedule
4. Cost Proposal
- Direct costs, indirect rate justification, cost allocation
5. Appendices
- DFARS compliance checklist, biosafety clearance, conflict disclosure
Example 3: Risk Mitigation Matrix
| Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation |
|------|-------------|--------|-----|
| DFARS compliance review delays | Medium | High | Early legal review; external audit |
| Foreign national clearance denial | Low | Critical | Plan domestic-only team; escalate early |
| Indirect cost rate negotiation | Medium | Medium | Lock rate pre-submission; budget buffer |
What's Included
- DFARS Compliance Checklist: Downloadable checklist of all DFARS clauses (data rights, foreign nationals, organizational conflicts, cost principles) with section-by-section guidance.
- DoD Funding Mechanism Templates: Pre-built outlines for SBIR/STTR, BAA, MURI, and peer-reviewed programs with military-specific narrative structures and evaluation criteria.
- Military Acronym & Glossary Database: Quick-reference guide to 200+ DoD acronyms, procurement terms, and research program names (OUSD(R&E), ECAD, CRADA, ITAR, EAR).
- Cost Compliance Worksheet: Excel-compatible cost analysis framework with indirect rate calculations, DFARS cost allowability rules, and audit-ready documentation templates.
- Conflict of Interest Assessment Framework: Structured questionnaire and disclosure template for identifying organizational conflicts, foreign ownership, and facility security clearance gaps.
- DoD FAR Clause Reference: Full-text summaries of mandatory DFARS clauses with plain-English interpretation, compliance requirements, and real proposal examples.
Who It's For
- Research Administration & Grants Officers
- Healthcare & University R&D Program Directors
- Compliance & Risk Management Professionals
- Principal Investigators & Research Scientists
- Proposal Development & Business Development Teams
Best For
- Writing competitive DoD proposals (SBIR, STTR, BAA, MURI)
- Conducting pre-submission compliance audits
- Accelerating proposal development timelines
- Identifying and mitigating organizational conflicts of interest
- Ensuring cost compliance and audit readiness
You might also like
You can systematically review research protocols against ethical frameworks, regulatory standards, and risk-benefit principles. This skill identifies compliance gaps, assesses risks to human or animal subjects, evaluates scientific merit against potential harms, and generates structured compliance reports that support institutional review board (IRB) decisions and regulatory submissions.
by hah23255
You'll design and optimize observational study protocols from conception through regulatory documentation. The skill guides you through identifying and quantifying confounders, selecting appropriate study designs (cohort, case-control, cross-sectional), implementing bias mitigation strategies, and generating publication-ready protocols that meet regulatory standards.
by hah23255
Design, validate, and refine clinical device trial protocols that meet FDA and ICH regulatory requirements. You'll receive detailed protocol structure, endpoint validation matrices, statistical power analysis, and enrollment strategy recommendations that accelerate patient recruitment while maintaining compliance.
by hah23255
You get expert guidance developing NSF-aligned healthcare research proposals from strategic positioning through final compliance. Claude analyzes your research concept against NSF priorities, structures a competitive narrative, justifies budget allocations, and ensures all compliance requirements (biosketch, data management plans, institutional review) are met. The result is a cohesive, review-ready proposal that increases your chances of NSF funding.
by hah23255
You structure clinical research manuscripts according to IMRaD (Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion) standards required by peer-reviewed journals. This skill helps you draft sections from raw research notes, polish prose for academic clarity, enforce citation standards, and identify common submission issues before sending to journals. The result is a manuscript ready for peer review with minimal editor feedback.
by hah23255
You can systematically work through complex clinical ethical dilemmas using proven frameworks like the Four Principles approach, principlism, casuistry, and virtue ethics. The skill maps all stakeholders, identifies competing ethical obligations, and generates IRB-ready documentation that prepares you for ethics committee consultations. You'll receive structured analysis, conflict resolution pathways, and compliance recommendations tailored to your specific case.
by hah23255
Create fully-accredited continuing medical education programs with learning objectives, educational content, assessments, and evaluation materials that meet ACCME and ANCC standards. This skill automates compliance validation, ensures proper alignment between objectives and content, and generates all required accreditation documentation in minutes instead of weeks.
by hah23255
You can design, validate, and execute statistical analyses for health outcomes research, comparative effectiveness studies, and clinical trials with regulatory rigor. This skill guides you through study design validation, appropriate statistical method selection, data quality assessment, hypothesis testing, and results interpretation aligned with FDA, EMA, and ICH-GCP standards. You'll generate publication-ready analysis plans and ensure your findings meet scientific and regulatory requirements for peer review or submission.
by hah23255