Pre-Award Compliance Verifier
Systematically verify grant proposals against federal, institutional, and funder compliance rules
What You Can Do
Systematically verify that grant proposals meet all applicable federal regulations (NSF, NIH, DoD, etc.), institutional policies, and funder-specific requirements before submission. The skill analyzes proposal documents against compliance checklists, identifies gaps or conflicts, and provides actionable remediation steps. This prevents costly rejections and submission delays caused by compliance oversights.
Features
Checks proposals against common federal funder rules (NSF, NIH, DoD, DOE, USDA) including eligibility criteria, budget limits, cost-sharing mandates, and indirect cost caps.
Verifies compliance with your institution's pre-award policies, signing authority levels, conflict-of-interest disclosures, and required internal approvals.
Analyzes proposal details against funder-specific requirements for formats, page limits, biographical sketches, data management plans, and publication policies.
Identifies missing compliance elements (approvals, certifications, disclosures, documentation) and provides step-by-step remediation with owner assignments.
Generates clear compliance summaries organized by federal, institutional, and funder-specific requirements with risk levels and priority flags.
Validates budget justifications against funder limits, ensures institutional cost-sharing commitments are documented, and flags unsupported expenses.
Checks submission deadlines, required approval timelines, and institutional review schedules against proposal milestones.
Example Output
Compliance Verification Report: NSF SBIR Phase II
Overall Status: ⚠️ 3 Critical Issues, 2 Warnings
Federal Requirements (NSF)
- ✅ Eligibility: Small business status confirmed
- ⚠️ Budget concern: Proposed $750K at NSF limit — no contingency buffer
- ✅ Indirect cost: 22% (within federally negotiated cap)
Institutional Requirements
- ✅ Conflict-of-interest disclosures: All PIs completed
- ❌ Missing: Research integrity approval required before submission (2-3 days)
- ✅ Cost-share: 10% institutional match documented
Funder-Specific (NSF SBIR)
- ✅ Project narrative: 15 pages (within 20-page limit)
- ⚠️ Data plan gap: No DOI strategy specified — NSF expects data sharing
- ❌ Format error: Co-PI biographical sketch uses CV format; NSF requires 2-page template
Remediation Checklist:
- Submit research integrity form to compliance office (Owner: Admin, 3 days)
- Reformat co-PI sketch using NSF template (Owner: Co-PI, 1 day)
- Add data sharing and DOI commitment to narrative (Owner: PI, 2 days)
What's Included
- Federal Compliance Checker: Pre-built rules for NSF, NIH, DoD, DOE, USDA covering eligibility, budget caps, cost-sharing, and indirect cost policies.
- Institutional Policy Database: Customizable templates for your institution's pre-award policies, signing authority matrices, and required approvals.
- Funder-Specific Rule Repository: Downloadable requirement checklists for 50+ federal and foundation funders across all NIH institutes, NSF directorates, and major private foundations.
- Compliance Report Template: Structured markdown template for generating actionable compliance summaries organized by requirement level with risk prioritization.
- Gap Remediation Workflow: Step-by-step guidance for resolving identified compliance gaps with owner assignment, time estimates, and required resources.
- Budget Audit Checklist: Validation rules for budget justification, cost-sharing documentation, allowable expenses, and funder-specific budget limitations.
Who It's For
- Grants Administrators & Pre-Award Specialists
- Research Coordinators & Project Managers
- Faculty Researchers & Project PIs
- University Compliance Officers
- Sponsored Programs & Grants Offices
Best For
- Pre-submission compliance audits for federal grant proposals
- Institutional policy compliance verification before routing
- Gap analysis and remediation planning
- Budget and cost-sharing validation
- Multi-funder requirement comparison and selection
You might also like
Streamline your systematic reviews by using Claude to screen abstracts against inclusion criteria, extract structured data from full texts, and synthesize findings across studies. Reduce manual screening time by 60-80% while maintaining rigorous documentation of your review methodology. Claude becomes your collaborative partner throughout the entire evidence synthesis workflow, from protocol planning to final data synthesis.
Create professional banners, design systems, and brand-compliant content across multiple platforms. This comprehensive skill suite provides design intelligence for building UI/UX with systematic token architecture, component specifications, visual identity management, and AI-powered creative asset generation. Perfect for designing branded experiences with consistency, speed, and professional quality.
You receive a detailed systematic audit of your IRB protocol against federal regulations, institutional policies, and ethical standards. The skill identifies specific compliance gaps, maps findings to regulatory citations, and generates documented recommendations for remediation. You get a structured compliance assessment that pinpoints risk areas before submission or inspection.
You can rapidly analyze multiple research papers, extract quality metrics using evidence hierarchy frameworks, and generate structured literature syntheses. Claude evaluates study design, sample sizes, bias risk, and statistical significance to produce clinically actionable summaries that support evidence-based decision-making for healthcare providers and researchers.
You can streamline the entire editorial process by automating peer review coordination, synthesizing reviewer feedback into coherent editorial decisions, and generating professional correspondence at scale. The skill helps you manage manuscript timelines, track reviewer assignments, and produce consistent decision documents that maintain your journal's professional standards while saving hours of editorial work.
You'll master the librarian's approach to research by learning how to conduct structured reference interviews that clarify your exact information needs. This skill helps you design comprehensive, multi-database search strategies tailored to your research question, including optimized Boolean search strings, database selection logic, and source evaluation frameworks that ensure you find the most relevant academic sources efficiently.
This skill analyzes your academic manuscript and journal submission metadata against indexing standards from major databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, DOAJ). It identifies compliance gaps, recommends metadata improvements, optimizes keywords for discoverability, and validates citation formatting—helping your research reach the right audience and meeting publisher requirements on first submission.
This skill systematically reviews your research proposal against funder requirements, institutional policies, and compliance checkpoints to identify issues before submission. It validates proposal structure, budget justifications, and timelines while flagging common violations that could trigger desk rejections or revision requests. You'll receive a detailed compliance report with specific issues, severity levels, and actionable remediation steps for each funder type.