Aerospace Human Factors Safety Analysis
Apply human factors frameworks to aerospace incident analysis and risk reduction
What You Can Do
You can systematically analyze aerospace accidents and incidents using evidence-based human factors frameworks like STAMP, SHEL, and Five Whys to identify systemic contributors beyond individual error. The skill pinpoints design flaws, procedural gaps, and organizational factors that created the accident pathway. You'll receive structured findings and specific, actionable interventions for design improvements or procedural changes to prevent recurrence.
Features
Apply STAMP, SHEL model, Swiss cheese model, Five Whys, and Reason's organizational failure analysis to the same incident for comprehensive coverage
Trace the complete accident pathway from contributing factors through organizational failures, not just individual crew errors
Identify latent failures, organizational pressures, and design vulnerabilities that aligned to create the accident
Generate specific cockpit design, systems integration, or procedural changes to block the identified accident pathway
Evaluate crew cognitive load, attention distribution, and information presentation that contributed to the incident
Identify breakdowns in crew resource management, ATC handoffs, or maintenance-flight crew interfaces
Score findings by likelihood, severity, and detection difficulty to prioritize which interventions to implement first
Example Output
Example 1: Controlled Flight Into Terrain Analysis
SHEL Framework Findings:
- Software: Approach briefing lacked terrain awareness protocol; crew relied on visual cues unavailable in low visibility
- Hardware: Terrain alerting system inhibited at low altitude by design; no go-around automation cuing
- Environment: Terrain masking, low-level wind shear, inadequate ground radar coverage
- Liveware: High workload during descent; captain's attention divided between navigation and weather
Latent Organizational Failures:
- Training culture discouraged automation reliance during high-workload phases
- Regulatory guidance permitted terrain alerting inhibition at low altitude
- Procedural design did not mandate terrain awareness discussion in low-visibility approaches
Ranked Interventions:
- High Priority: Redesign terrain alerting to remain active below 500 feet with distinct audio alert
- High Priority: Revise approach briefing to mandate terrain awareness discussion in low-visibility conditions
- Medium Priority: Update crew training to normalize automation use during high-workload phases
Example 2: Maintenance Communication Failure
Five Whys + System Analysis: Engine failure from undetected compressor blade crack → Borescope inspection was scheduled but crew never received notification → Maintenance and flight crew scheduling operate on separate databases with no real-time sync → Scheduled inspections trigger alerts only in legacy paper logs
Design Intervention: Implement real-time maintenance-to-dispatch integration with automated flight crew notification 48 hours before affected flight departure.
What's Included
- Framework selection guide: Decision tree to choose STAMP, SHEL, Reason model, or combination based on incident type
- Structured analysis template: Step-by-step prompts to extract incident facts, apply framework logic, and map findings to intervention areas
- Risk matrix and prioritization: Severity-likelihood-detectability scoring to rank interventions and allocate remediation resources
- Intervention recommendation library: Pre-built design change, procedural, training, and organizational remediation suggestions for aerospace context
- Human factors vocabulary reference: Glossary for consistent terminology (latent failures, active failures, workload, situation awareness) in reports
Who It's For
- Aviation Safety Engineers
- Accident Investigators and Safety Board Analysts
- Flight Operations Directors and Pilots
- Systems Safety Engineers
- Maintenance and Design Engineers
Best For
- Formal accident investigation and reporting
- Design review safety analysis for new aircraft or systems
- Systemic incident pattern identification across similar events
- Procedural and training curriculum improvement
- Regulatory compliance and safety case documentation
You might also like
This skill helps you develop comprehensive expert witness reports grounded in forensic psychology research, case law, and evidentiary standards. It guides you through crafting testimony strategies that anticipate cross-examination challenges, identify weaknesses in opposing arguments, and present psychological conclusions with maximum credibility before court. You'll produce documentation that withstands legal scrutiny and jury standards.
by omkamal
You can design and validate selection systems that maximize predictive accuracy while minimizing legal risk. The skill applies industrial-organizational psychology principles to create structured assessments, job analyses, and validity evidence that withstand regulatory scrutiny. You'll generate documentation that demonstrates how your selection criteria connect to job performance and comply with EEOC/OFCCP standards.
by omkamal
Systematically analyze performance gaps in your organization using data-driven methodologies, then design targeted, evidence-based training interventions. Claude guides you through root cause analysis, learner needs assessment, and comprehensive program design with clear implementation timelines and success metrics. You'll move beyond generic training to interventions proven to close specific skill gaps.
by omkamal
This skill guides you through comprehensive usability analysis workflows—from planning research activities and conducting user interviews to synthesizing findings and generating data-backed recommendations. You'll transform raw research data into structured insights that inform product decisions, identify usability pain points, and prioritize improvements based on user impact and feasibility. The skill handles everything from creating research templates and analysis frameworks to generating executive summaries and implementation roadmaps.
by omkamal
You can systematically examine aerospace incidents, cockpit procedures, and interface designs using established human factors frameworks like SHEL, Norman's action theory, and Reason's accident causation model. The skill identifies human performance bottlenecks, error traps, and design vulnerabilities—then recommends evidence-based mitigations that reduce cognitive workload, enhance situational awareness, and prevent accidents.
by omkamal
You systematically architect feature requirements for connected car infotainment systems by synthesizing customer insights, technical constraints, and regulatory mandates. This skill structures the translation of market data into unambiguous specifications that engineering teams can execute against, accounting for legacy hardware integration, multi-generational vehicle platforms, and safety-critical certification requirements.
by omkamal
This skill transforms raw clinical findings and assessment data into structured, legally defensible competency evaluation reports. You provide clinical observations, test scores, and relevant history; Claude organizes them into coherent narratives with proper test cross-referencing, expert reasoning frameworks, and standards-compliant conclusions that withstand legal scrutiny.
by omkamal
You can systematically diagnose organizational problems using established frameworks (McKinsey 7S, Burke-Litwin, root cause analysis), generate actionable intervention designs tailored to your specific context, and create stakeholder-aligned change strategies. This skill helps you move from symptom identification to targeted solutions with built-in implementation roadmaps.
by omkamal