
Trade Agreement Analyzer
Analyze trade agreements and model economic impacts for diplomatic strategy
What You Can Do
Rapidly extract and analyze the terms, tariffs, and economic implications of trade agreements. You can model how policy changes affect trade flows, employment, and GDP across sectors. Claude generates executive-level briefing materials, risk assessments, and strategic options for negotiators—complete with data-backed comparative analysis and compliance frameworks.
Features
Automatically parse and structure tariff schedules, rules of origin, and trade commitments from agreements of any length or complexity.
Model how tariffs, quotas, and trade flows translate into sectoral employment, GDP effects, and cross-border supply chain impacts.
Compare multiple agreements side-by-side to identify competitive disadvantages, inconsistencies, and negotiation leverage points.
Flag potential conflicts with existing commitments, WTO obligations, and domestic law; identify enforcement vulnerabilities.
Produce diplomat-ready executive summaries, briefing books, and talking points with structured arguments for negotiation scenarios.
Model alternative outcomes (tariff reductions, phase-in periods, exceptions) to stress-test negotiating positions and forecast partner responses.
Identify affected industries, workers, and regions; quantify distributional impacts to support domestic political strategy.
Search comparable terms across prior agreements to establish negotiating baselines and identify non-standard demands.
Example Output
Input: Text of a proposed free-trade agreement between your country and Partner Country X
Output:
Executive Summary
- Headline: Agreement eliminates tariffs on 87% of goods; phased implementation over 6 years for sensitive sectors
- Employment impact: +12,000 jobs in automotive; -4,500 in textiles; net +7,500 over 10 years
- GDP effect: +0.3% ($75B cumulative over 5 years)
- Key risks: Insufficient safeguards on IP enforcement; inconsistent rules of origin with prior agreement
Tariff Schedule Comparison
| Sector | Current Duty | Post-Agreement | Phase-In Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Autos | 2.5% | 0% | 6 years |
| Textiles | 12% | 0% | 10 years |
| Agriculture | 8% avg | 2% avg | 8 years |
Compliance Flags
- ⚠️ Rules of origin threshold conflicts with precedent
- ✅ Labor standards alignment verified
- ⚠️ IP enforcement gaps in pharmaceutical patents
Negotiation Talking Points
- Demand reciprocal tariff cuts on your high-value sectors
- Insert safeguard clause to address domestic political opposition
- Align technical standards with prior agreements to reduce litigation risk
What's Included
- Agreement Extraction Templates: Pre-built prompts to parse tariff schedules, rules of origin, investment chapters, and dispute settlement terms from raw text.
- Economic Impact Model: Framework to estimate sectoral tariff impacts, employment effects, and GDP consequences using comparative advantage analysis.
- Compliance & Risk Checklist: Structured review of potential conflicts with WTO rules, prior agreements, and domestic legislation to flag legal exposure.
- Briefing Material Templates: Ready-to-customize executive summaries, talking point outlines, and stakeholder impact assessments for government and private-sector briefings.
- Comparative Analysis Workflow: Side-by-side comparison framework to benchmark proposed terms against prior agreements and identify outlier demands.
- Scenario Planning Tool: Prompt-driven scenario explorer to model alternative outcomes, phase-in timelines, and exceptions and their trade-offs.
Who It's For
- Trade negotiators and diplomats
- Economic policy advisors and analysts
- Government trade lawyers and compliance officers
- Corporate trade strategy and government affairs teams
- Think tank and academic researchers
Best For
- Pre-negotiation briefings on partner demands and leverage points
- Tariff schedule analysis and sector-level impact modeling
- Compliance risk assessment and precedent comparison
- Negotiation scenario planning and talking point development
- Domestic stakeholder communication and political strategy







