
AML/KYC Regulatory Framework Analyzer
Map FATF, FinCEN, and FCA guidance into jurisdiction-specific AML/KYC compliance frameworks
What You Can Do
You can systematically convert abstract regulatory guidance from FATF, FinCEN, FCA, and regional authorities into concrete operational procedures mapped to your specific jurisdiction and customer profile. The skill extracts overlapping requirements, identifies contradictions between frameworks, and generates risk-weighted compliance matrices that prevent both dangerous gaps and wasteful over-compliance. You'll produce documentation showing exactly which procedures satisfy which regulatory obligations—essential for examinations and audit defense.
Features
Automatically identify and cross-reference AML/KYC obligations from FATF Recommendations, FinCEN guidance, FCA rules, and regional regulations
Create compliance matrices showing which requirements apply to your operating jurisdictions and customer segments
Compare current operational procedures against regulatory expectations to surface compliance deficiencies
Generate documentation linking each compliance procedure directly to the specific regulatory obligation it satisfies
Develop tiered KYC/AML procedures based on regulatory sophistication levels and customer risk profiles
Design monitoring thresholds and scenarios that satisfy regulatory standards while remaining operationally feasible
Identify conflicting requirements across jurisdictions and propose harmonized compliance approaches
Evaluate your current program against multi-jurisdictional standards before regulatory examination
Example Output
Input: FinCEN's new crypto-asset rule guidance document + your current KYC questionnaire
Output:
JURISDICTION: United States (FinCEN Guidance 2024)
CUSTOMER SEGMENT: Institutional Crypto Traders
REQUIREMENT: Enhanced Due Diligence for High-Risk Jurisdictions
→ Regulatory Source: FinCEN Guidance §312(b)(1)
→ Your Procedure: Mandatory OFAC screening + beneficial ownership verification for entities in FATF Grey List countries
→ Implementation Gap: Current system flags only Specially Designated Nationals; missing beneficial owner jurisdiction check
→ Compliance Action: Enhance KYC questionnaire with beneficial owner residency field; update screening logic
Input: Multi-jurisdiction operating scope (US, EU, Singapore)
Output: Compliance matrix showing:
- 15 core AML/KYC requirements
- Jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction applicability (✓ Required / ○ Best Practice / ✗ Not Applicable)
- Risk rating for each jurisdiction
- Recommended KYC tier thresholds by region
What's Included
- SKILL.md instruction file: Core prompting framework for regulatory analysis and mapping
- AML/KYC Requirement Extraction Template: Structured format for cataloging regulatory obligations from any guidance document
- Jurisdiction Compliance Matrix Template: Pre-built spreadsheet structure showing requirement applicability across regions
- Procedure-to-Requirement Traceability Checklist: Audit-ready documentation linking procedures to regulatory sources
- Risk-Weighted KYC Tier Framework: Customer segmentation and due diligence scaling based on regulatory risk levels
- Gap Analysis Worksheet: Systematic comparison of current practices against extracted regulatory standards
Who It's For
- Crypto Compliance Officers — Building or updating AML/KYC programs across multiple jurisdictions
- Compliance Operations Managers — Translating regulatory guidance into operational procedures and monitoring rules
- Crypto Exchange & Wallet Service Operators — Documenting compliance frameworks for licensing and regulatory examination
- Fintech Legal & Compliance Teams — Assessing regulatory impact and updating procedures for new guidance
- Risk & Governance Leads — Conducting compliance readiness assessments before regulatory audits
Best For
- Responding to new regulatory guidance (FinCEN rules, EU crypto-asset regulations, state licensing requirements)
- Building or updating jurisdiction-specific KYC/AML procedures from regulatory source documents
- Preparing compliance documentation for regulatory examination or licensing application
- Designing transaction monitoring rules that satisfy regulatory thresholds and patterns
- Harmonizing compliance procedures across multiple jurisdictions with overlapping or conflicting requirements







