Petroleum Source Rock Characterization & Hydrocarbon Generation Assessment
Evaluate source rock quality, maturity, and hydrocarbon generation potential from geochemical data
What You Can Do
You can analyze geochemical analytical data to characterize petroleum source rocks and quantify their hydrocarbon generation potential. This skill guides you through interpreting Rock-Eval pyrolysis parameters (S1, S2, S3, Tmax), assessing thermal maturity using vitrinite reflectance and Tmax correlations, classifying kerogen types (I-IV), calculating transformation ratios, and evaluating depositional environments to construct petroleum systems models and manage exploration risk.
Features
extract S1, S2, S3, Tmax values and derive source rock quality indices and hydrogen index calculations
correlate Tmax, vitrinite reflectance (%Ro), and TAI data to determine oil and gas generation windows
apply Type I, II, III, IV frameworks to predict hydrocarbon product type and generation potential
calculate and interpret petroleum generation and expulsion efficiency from maturity and TOC data
adjust assessment frameworks for depositional environment, organic matter source, and basin thermal history
link source rock characterization to charge risk, migration pathways, and prospect viability
evaluate source rock quality across multiple wells and stratigraphic intervals to identify fairway trends
assign source rock quality, maturity, and timing risk scores for exploration decision-making
Example Output
Example 1: Well XYZ-1 Source Rock Assessment
- Interval: Jurassic Shale (1,850–1,920 m)
- Rock-Eval Results: S2 = 8.2 mg HC/g rock, Tmax = 435°C, HI = 385 mg HC/g TOC
- Thermal Maturity: %Ro = 0.78–0.82 (early oil window)
- Kerogen Type: Type II (marine/lacustrine, oil-prone)
- Transformation Ratio: ~45% (active generation phase)
- Assessment: Good-quality active source rock, currently generating oil
Example 2: Regional Play Fairway Comparison
- Well A: S2 = 12.5 (excellent), Type II, Ro = 0.95 (peak oil)
- Well B: S2 = 3.2 (poor), Type III, Ro = 0.55 (immature)
- Well C: S2 = 9.1 (good), Type II, Ro = 1.35 (dry gas window)
- Play Fairway: Recommend drilling along Well A–C trend; Well B zone is quality risk
What's Included
- SKILL.md: Core methodology file with Rock-Eval interpretation framework and kerogen typing classification
- Geochemical Data Interpretation Template: Structured worksheet for entering analytical results and calculating quality indices
- Thermal Maturity Correlation Chart: Visual guide linking Tmax to %Ro and petroleum generation windows
- Kerogen Type Decision Matrix: Rapid classification framework using HI vs. OI cross-plots
- Petroleum Systems Assessment Checklist: Risk evaluation framework for source rock charge, timing, and expulsion
Who It's For
- Petroleum geochemists evaluating source rock potential in exploration programs
- Subsurface and basin analysts constructing petroleum systems models
- Exploration geologists assessing prospect charge risk and play fairway viability
- Production geoscientists diagnosing hydrocarbon charge in producing fields
- Resource assessment teams quantifying basin hydrocarbon potential
Best For
- Interpreting Rock-Eval pyrolysis and organic geochemistry laboratory data
- Assessing source rock maturity and thermal history across wells and basins
- Classifying kerogen type and predicting oil vs. gas generation capacity
- Developing play fairway maps with source rock quality as a risk parameter
- Constructing petroleum systems models linking source, seal, and migration pathways
- Evaluating exploration drilling results for source rock viability
You might also like
You can perform comprehensive wellbore hydraulics analysis by inputting well geometry, fluid properties, and operational parameters. Claude calculates pressure drops across open hole and cased hole sections, determines equivalent circulating density (ECD) for narrow margin windows, identifies flow regime transitions, and provides optimization recommendations that balance ROP, hole cleaning, and well control margins. This enables you to validate designs, troubleshoot pressure anomalies, and make data-driven adjustments to flow rates and drilling fluid specifications before issues impact operations.
by delphine-l
You can use this skill to systematize seismic interpretation workflows without replacing specialized software like Kingdom or Petrel. It helps you organize fault geometry analysis, establish chronostratigraphic frameworks, identify seismic facies patterns, define trap configuration and spill geometry, and assess seal integrity. The skill transforms scattered observations into documented, reproducible interpretive products that support volumetric assessment and drilling decisions.
by delphine-l
You can process cuttings samples, core descriptions, wireline logs, and offset well data simultaneously to identify formation boundaries, detect unexpected lithology, and generate actionable drilling recommendations within 15–30 minutes. The skill cross-validates disparate data sources to confirm formation picks, mitigates drilling delays that cost $1M+/day on deepwater rigs, and produces audit-compliant documentation of stratigraphic decisions made in real time.
by delphine-l
You can conduct systematic hazard identification across operational zones, quantify exposure severity using evidence-based risk matrices, and develop hierarchical control strategies with realistic implementation timelines. This skill helps you document defensible assessments that satisfy regulatory requirements (OSHA, API, IMCA) and support informed decision-making for health protection measures.
by delphine-l
You can analyze pressure buildup and drawdown test data to identify flow regimes, apply type curve matching techniques to estimate reservoir properties, and conduct material balance studies to quantify original oil/gas in place (OOIP/OGIP). Claude helps you evaluate pressure support mechanisms, generate production forecasts under different depletion scenarios, and assess reserve uncertainty from pressure interpretation data.
by delphine-l
You can systematically interpret sedimentary facies from core descriptions, wireline logs, and outcrop data to build coherent paleoenvironmental models. This skill helps you classify lithofacies and ichnofacies, recognize recurring depositional patterns, correlate stratigraphic intervals across multiple wells, and predict reservoir quality and geometry based on depositional systems. You'll move beyond simple lithologic logging to derive interpretations that directly support exploration risking, play fairway mapping, and field development planning.
by delphine-l
You can decompose seismic interpretation into discrete analysis phases—structural identification, stratigraphic correlation, fault characterization, seal integrity evaluation, and source-to-trap geometry validation. Claude generates ranked prospect summaries with explicit confidence levels tied to seismic data quality, regional analogs, and pressure regime consistency, giving you documented rationale for go/no-go decisions and resource allocation across exploration blocks.
by delphine-l
You can systematically analyze formation pressure measurements, buildup/drawdown test data, and long-term monitoring records to diagnose underlying reservoir behavior. This skill helps you identify depletion trends, detect faulting or sealing boundaries, quantify aquifer support, track fluid contact movement, and reveal wellbore communication patterns—transforming raw pressure data into strategic guidance for drilling locations, completion design, and production operations.
by delphine-l