
Lever Candidate Screening & Evaluation Framework
Screen and rank Lever candidates with structured evaluation framework
What You Can Do
Systematically evaluate candidates in Lever using a structured framework that extracts key qualifications, identifies strengths and red flags, scores competencies, and generates actionable hiring recommendations. You'll move from unstructured resume review to consistent, defensible candidate rankings that reduce bias and accelerate hiring decisions.
Features
pull key skills, experience, and education from resumes into a consistent format
evaluate candidates against role-specific competencies with weighted scoring
generate comparative analyses to identify top performers relative to job requirements
surface experience gaps, concerning employment patterns, or skill mismatches automatically
determine if a candidate is ready to advance or needs additional screening
generate professional, objective reasons for pass decisions
structure team discussions for subjective evaluation alignment
Example Output
Candidate: Sarah Chen
-
✅ Core Match Score: 8.2/10
-
Technical Skills: 9/10 (Python, React, SQL all present)
-
Leadership: 7/10 (Led 2 projects, no direct reports)
-
Communication: 8/10 (Clear resume, no red flags)
-
🚩 Concerns: 12-month employment gap (2020-2021) — needs explanation in screening call
Recommendation: Advance to technical screen
Comparative Analysis: Top 3 Candidates
| Candidate | Overall | Technical | Experience | Culture Fit | Next Step |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarah Chen | 8.2 | 9/10 | 7/10 | 8/10 | Phone Screen |
| Marcus Reid | 7.8 | 8/10 | 8/10 | 7/10 | Phone Screen |
| Alex Patel | 6.9 | 7/10 | 7/10 | 7/10 | Hold |
Recommendation: Phone screen top 2 candidates this week.
What's Included
- SKILL.md: Complete Lever candidate evaluation framework with scoring methodology and workflows
- Resume Evaluation Template: Standardized form for extracting and assessing candidate qualifications
- Competency Scoring Rubric: Role-specific evaluation matrix with behavioral anchors (Junior, Mid, Senior levels)
- Candidate Comparison Matrix: Side-by-side framework for ranking multiple candidates
- Interview Readiness Checklist: Go/No-Go criteria for advancing candidates to next stages
- Rejection Reasoning Guide: Objective decision language for communicating pass decisions
Who It's For
- Hiring Managers — Quickly evaluate candidates without training on evaluation frameworks
- Recruiting Coordinators & Sourcers — Standardize initial resume screening and create consistent handoff notes
- HR Professionals — Facilitate structured interviews and calibration sessions across interview panels
- Technical Recruiters — Assess technical fit against role requirements before scheduling calls
- Talent Acquisition Teams — Implement consistent evaluation methodology across multiple open roles
Best For
- Initial resume screening — Process high-volume candidate lists and identify qualified candidates
- Candidate ranking — Compare finalists objectively and select top candidates for interviews
- Bias reduction — Apply consistent, role-based criteria instead of subjective impressions
- Interview preparation — Brief interviewers on candidate background and focus areas before meetings
- Hiring calibration sessions — Structure team discussions to align on candidate assessment and advance/hold decisions







