
Podiatric Surgical Case Planning & Decision Support
Structured surgical planning and complication prevention for foot and ankle cases
What You Can Do
You can input patient presentation, imaging, and clinical findings to receive a structured case analysis that compares multiple surgical approaches, identifies contraindications and risk factors specific to the patient, anticipates procedure-specific complications, and generates pre-operative documentation. This skill helps you systematically work through cases with anatomical complexity, prior surgery, revision needs, or elevated surgical risk where multiple viable pathways exist.
Features
Organizes patient history, imaging findings, biomechanics, and comorbidities into a structured assessment framework
Evaluates multiple technique options (e.g., Lapidus vs. Austin vs. Scarf for HAV) with pros/cons for your specific case
Identifies diabetes, vascular disease, smoking, age, arthritis, neurovascular compromise, and other factors affecting surgical planning
Generates procedure-specific and patient-specific complication lists with prevention strategies
Flags anatomical, medical, and behavioral factors that may require technique modification or patient counseling
Structures pre-operative notes capturing clinical reasoning, surgical selection rationale, and risk mitigation plans
Generates clear written explanations of planned procedure, expected recovery, and realistic outcome ranges
Analyzes prior operative reports and outcomes to inform new surgical approach selection
Example Output
Example 1: Complex Bunionectomy Case
Patient: 68-year-old with severe HAV (IMA 18°, HVA 35°), prior failed scarf osteotomy, Type 2 diabetes, PAD history
Surgical Approach Comparison:
- Lapidus arthrodesis: Corrects high IMA, but patient's diabetes increases fusion non-union risk. Requires longer immobilization (8-12 wks). Consider.
- Scarf revision: Prior scarf malunion visible on imaging. High re-recurrence risk with same technique.
- Austin osteotomy: Insufficient for IMA >17°. Not recommended for this case.
Patient-Specific Risks: Diabetes (impaired healing), PAD (monitor perfusion), prior surgery (adhesions expected)
Complication Prevention Plan: Extended immobilization support, aggressive glucose management coordination, intraoperative perfusion assessment
Example 2: Flatfoot Reconstruction Decisions
Patient: 52-year-old with rigid flatfoot, moderate ankle arthritis, chronic posterior tibial tendon dysfunction
Recommended Approach: Double arthrodesis (TC + CC) rather than triple given preserved ankle ROM. Rationale documented with anatomical reasoning.
Complication Anticipation: Midfoot stiffness (expected), sural nerve risk (surgical approach planning), hardware irritation (implant selection noted)
What's Included
- SKILL.md instruction file with use-case triggers and skill overview:
- Surgical case analysis template: Structured sections for patient demographics, imaging interpretation, biomechanical assessment, and surgical decision matrix
- Approach comparison framework: Side-by-side technique evaluation (indications, contraindications, outcomes for each option)
- Risk stratification checklist: Comorbidity screening, anatomical complexity scoring, and patient-specific risk modification strategies
- Complication prevention protocol: Procedure-specific and diabetes/vascular/age-related risk mitigation steps with documentation points
- Pre-operative summary template: Clinical reasoning documentation ready for chart integration or patient discussion
Who It's For
- Podiatric surgeons — Planning complex foot and ankle cases with multiple viable surgical pathways
- Surgical residents/fellows — Structuring case analysis and building decision-making frameworks under supervision
- Foot and ankle specialists — Managing revision cases, high-risk patients, or anatomically challenging presentations
- Surgical case managers — Coordinating pre-operative risk assessment and comorbidity optimization before elective foot surgery
- Podiatric surgical centers — Standardizing pre-operative documentation and complication prevention protocols across cases
Best For
- Bunionectomy approach selection (Lapidus vs. osteotomy vs. arthrodesis decisions)
- Flatfoot reconstruction planning (arthrodesis level and technique selection)
- Revision foot and ankle surgery (analyzing prior failures and new approach selection)
- High-risk surgical patient assessment (diabetes, vascular disease, age-related comorbidities)
- Complication prevention documentation (patient-specific risk mitigation and informed consent)
- Anatomically complex cases (severe deformity, limited ROM, neurovascular variant anatomy)
- Multi-technique case comparison and surgical decision documentation







