Differentiated ELL Assessment Builder for Secondary Students
Create tiered ELL assessments aligned to ACTFL/WIDA proficiency levels in minutes
What You Can Do
Build three assessment variants from a single learning objective or content topic. Each tier adjusts linguistic complexity, visual supports, and cognitive demand to match student proficiency levels—so your Intermediate learners answer the same content questions as Advanced students, but with simplified syntax and sentence frames. You'll generate legally defensible differentiated assessments in 20 minutes instead of hours, yielding accurate data on what students understand versus what language barriers obscure.
Features
automatically adjusts question type, vocabulary, syntax, and cognitive demand to match ACTFL Novice, Intermediate, and Advanced levels
ensures assessments target appropriate English language development standards alongside content objectives
includes image prompts, word banks, sentence frames, and graphic organizers for lower proficiency tiers
all three assessment tiers assess the same learning objective so you can compare understanding across proficiency levels
generate quick formative checks (5–10 minute checks) alongside summative assessment variants
produces proficiency-level-appropriate rubrics so grading reflects language development, not penalizes grammar
flags questions that reveal when students are ready to move to higher proficiency tier
Example Output
Example Assessment Output: Topic — Photosynthesis (Science Unit)
Novice-Level Variant:
- Picture matching: "Plants make food. Which picture shows this? (A) sun, (B) plant with sun, (C) animal"
- Fill-in-the-blank with word bank: "Plants need [sun / water / light] to make food."
- True/False with visual: "Plants need sunlight. ☀️ True or False?"
Intermediate-Level Variant:
- Short-answer with frame: "What do plants need to make food? Use: 'Plants need _____ and _____ to make food.'"
- Diagram labeling: "Label the parts of the plant and write what each part does in making food."
- Explanation: "How does sunlight help plants? Write 2–3 sentences."
Advanced-Level Variant:
- Open-ended analysis: "Photosynthesis converts light energy into chemical energy. Explain this process in your own words and describe why it matters to humans."
- Application: "If a plant has plenty of water and carbon dioxide but no sunlight for 3 weeks, predict what will happen and explain why."
- Evidence synthesis: "Some plants grow in low-light environments (shade plants). How might their photosynthesis differ from sun plants? What evidence supports your hypothesis?"
What's Included
- SKILL.md instruction file with usage guidelines:
- Tiered Assessment Template: editable Google Doc/Word format with Novice, Intermediate, Advanced columns
- WIDA Standard Quick-Ref Chart: maps proficiency descriptors to question types and language features
- Scaffolding Framework Checklist: ensures visual supports, sentence frames, and vocabulary modifications are consistent across tiers
- Rubric Builder for Differentiated Grading: adjusts expectations by proficiency level so you assess content, not penalize language development
Who It's For
- Secondary ESL/ELL teachers managing mixed-proficiency classes (grades 6–12)
- Content teachers working with ELL co-teachers on unit assessment design
- ESL specialists creating progress-monitoring assessments for individual students
- Special education teachers supporting ELL students with language-based learning differences
- Instructional coaches supporting teachers in differentiating high-stakes assessments
Best For
- Unit or chapter assessments in mixed-proficiency ELL classes
- Mid-unit formative comprehension checks that reveal actual student understanding
- Proficiency-level placement and re-classification decisions
- Progress monitoring for students transitioning between proficiency tiers
- Defensible differentiation documentation for IEPs, 504 plans, or accountability audits
You might also like
Design complete differentiated lesson materials in minutes instead of hours. You provide your topic, learning objective, and student assessment data, and Claude generates three distinct content versions (below grade level, on grade level, advanced), scaffolded readings with adjusted vocabulary and complexity, tiered assignments with differentiated success criteria, and targeted intervention strategies for struggling learners. Every material maintains academic rigor while meeting students where they actually are.
You can design mixed-ability lessons that simultaneously engage students at different readiness levels, learning modalities, and interests. Claude helps you generate parallel learning pathways—with scaffolded supports for struggling learners, grade-level content for on-level students, and extension challenges for advanced learners—all organized around the same objective. This approach eliminates the need to plan three separate lessons while ensuring all students access grade-level standards and stay cognitively engaged.
You can conduct comprehensive audits of curriculum documents, instructional units, and assessment systems against state, national, and specialized standards frameworks (Common Core, NGSS, social-emotional learning standards, etc.). Claude identifies alignment gaps at scale, flags coverage deficits by grade level and subject, and generates data-driven reports that prioritize professional development and resource allocation decisions.
You can consolidate disparate student data from psychoeducational evaluations, progress monitoring, and classroom observations into IEP-ready formats. Claude generates structured meeting agendas with evidence-based discussion points, drafts plain-language summaries of complex test results for families, and identifies potential parent concerns before they surface—helping you conduct more informed, efficient meetings with stronger family engagement.
You can generate fully scaffolded lesson plans that serve students across the achievement spectrum without creating separate lessons. Claude translates standards into layered learning objectives (foundational, grade-level, advanced), generates parallel tasks with identical rigor but different modalities, embeds quick formative assessments, and produces extension activities for early finishers plus intervention supports for struggling learners. This skill cuts lesson planning time while ensuring every student has an appropriate entry point and challenge level.
You can systematically assess student crisis situations using evidence-based screening frameworks, quickly identify immediate safety risks and protective factors, and generate individualized safety plans aligned with school policy and legal requirements. This skill structures your clinical judgment during high-stress moments, helping you document findings thoroughly and prepare family notification conversations that anticipate resistance or denial.
You can systematically assess student suicide risk, self-harm concerns, and threats to safety using C-SSRS principles and threat assessment frameworks. The skill helps you stratify risk levels, document clinical decision-making that meets legal/ethical standards, and generate immediate safety planning recommendations—critical functions that protect student welfare and your professional liability.
You can architect adaptive learning pathways that respond to individual student performance, automatically branching students toward remediation when they struggle, acceleration when they demonstrate mastery, or enrichment for advanced learners. The skill helps you embed formative assessment decision points, scaffold content difficulty and modality, and align branching logic to competency frameworks—enabling differentiated instruction at scale in digital-first or blended learning environments.