
Research Grants
Write competitive research proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, and DARPA
What You Can Do
You can craft persuasive research proposals that meet the exact requirements of NSF, NIH, DOE, and DARPA programs. This skill guides you through agency-specific review criteria, narrative structure, budget preparation, broader impacts statements, and significance demonstrations—ensuring your proposals stand out to review panels and align with each agency's strategic priorities.
Features
tailored structures for NSF, NIH, DOE, and DARPA with their distinct review criteria and formatting requirements
develop compelling technical narratives that demonstrate innovation and feasibility
articulate research value, societal benefit, and scientific innovation in agency-preferred language
prepare detailed budget narratives, personnel allocation, and equipment justifications
create realistic project schedules with deliverables and contingency planning
strengthen proposals with evidence of concept viability and team capability
address reviewer comments and strengthen weak sections for revised proposals
structure team roles, cost-sharing, and inter-institutional coordination
Example Output
Example 1: NSF-Specific Project Description
- Demonstrates innovation within NSF's intellectual merit criteria
- Includes preliminary data visualizations and methodology diagrams
- Aligns technical approach with program solicitation priorities
Example 2: NIH Broader Impacts Narrative
- Articulates public health relevance and workforce development
- Addresses NIH's emphasis on diversity and inclusion in research
- Connects basic research to translational applications
Example 3: DARPA Budget Justification
- Details labor costs, equipment, and subcontractor roles
- Justifies spending against technical milestones
- Demonstrates cost-effective resource allocation
What's Included
- SKILL.md instruction file with agency requirements and best practices:
- NSF/NIH/DOE/DARPA proposal templates with section-by-section guidance:
- Budget preparation worksheet with personnel and equipment cost frameworks:
- Broader impacts checklist for alignment with agency evaluation criteria:
- Reviewer comment response framework for proposal revisions:
- Research timeline template with milestone definitions and contingency planning:
Who It's For
- Principal investigators and faculty members pursuing federal research funding
- Research scientists and postdoctoral researchers developing grant submissions
- University grants and contracts administrators supporting proposal preparation
- Program managers in research institutions coordinating multi-institutional proposals
- Graduate students learning proposal writing for collaborative research projects
Best For
- NSF research proposals across STEM disciplines and engineering programs
- NIH research project grants (R01s) and exploratory development grants (R21s)
- DOE research solicitations in energy science and advanced manufacturing
- DARPA innovative research proposals requiring technical feasibility demonstration
- Resubmission packages addressing previous reviewer feedback and strengthening narratives







